May 22, 2007On Suits and Prophylactics: Recurring Environmental Coverage IssuesCommercial general liability policies provide coverage for the insured’s liability for “damages” on account of bodily injury and property damage and require the insurer to provide a defense to “suits” seeking such damages. Since the beginning of the environmental liability coverage wars some twenty-five years ago, insurers have disputed whether their insureds’ environmental liabilities seek to impose “damages”, are on account of “property damage,” and are adjudicated in the context of “suit[s].” Recent cases have continued to address these recurring issues. Continue reading "On Suits and Prophylactics: Recurring Environmental Coverage Issues" Posted by Marc Mayerson at 12:31 AM | Add New Comment | TrackBack (0) May 21, 2007Odoriferous OccurrenceAnaerobic decomposition produces among other things hydrogen sulfide gas. It is this gas that makes flatulents distinctive from, shall we say, the bouquet of a rose. This was illustrated in a recent coverage case involving a Minnesota pig farm that created a concrete lagoon with capacity to hold 1.5 million gallons of manure. Three-quarters of a mile away was a neighbor’s home. Continue reading "Odoriferous Occurrence" Posted by Marc Mayerson at 02:04 PM | Add New Comment | TrackBack (0) March 02, 2007Appraising Appraisers and AppraisalsIn many property-insurance policies, a party has a right to demand an appraisal, which is procedure in which the value of lost or damaged property is determined. Typically, an appraisal takes the form of what I call a 1 + 1 + 1 structure – each party appoints its own appraiser, and if the two party-appointed appraisers cannot agree on a number the two together then select an umpire (or a court will select an umpire to decide if the two cannot agree on one). That some form of alternative dispute resolution is used for valuation, however, does not mean that there is no room for judicial intervention in disputes involving insurance policies with appraisal provisions. Continue reading "Appraising Appraisers and Appraisals" Posted by Marc Mayerson at 11:51 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0) February 18, 2007Does a Court's (Reversed) Disparagement of the Policyholder's Coverage Claim Alone Eviscerate Its Bad-Faith Claim?A common enough scenario in a liability-insurance case: the parties file cross-motions for summary judgment, with the insurer arguing it has no duty to defend. In Acme United Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (7th Cir. Jan. 9, 2007), the question presented was whether an advertising injury liability insurance policy provided coverage for a suit against the insured for product disparagement. In Acme, the district court accepted the argument of the insurer, thus cutting off the ability of the policyholder to obtain recovery of the defense costs it had run up. Where, as here, the appellate court reverses and finds coverage, does the district court's now-reversed ruling effectively impale the policyholder's bad-faith claim? Posted by Marc Mayerson at 11:02 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) |